PH Deck

Users manage projects using fragmented tools (e.g., Asana, Trello, spreadsheets), leading to manual tracking, lack of real-time insights, and inefficient collaboration

Users rely on manual processes in traditional project management tools, leading to inefficient task generation, undetected risks, and time-consuming progress tracking.

Teams face challenges in project planning

Creating Gantt charts manually is time-consuming and prone to errors

Risk management is reactive rather than proactive

Collaboration among team members is not streamlined

Users manually organize, rename, and convert files in File Explorer, which is time-consuming and inefficient.

Users struggle with traditional task management systems that often do not efficiently leverage technology to optimize productivity and organization. The current situation often involves manually prioritizing and scheduling tasks across various platforms, which can be both time-consuming and prone to human error. Manually prioritizing and scheduling tasks is a key drawback.

Project leaders currently manage tasks manually or with disjointed tools, leading to inefficient communication, missed deadlines, and lack of real-time progress tracking.

Users struggle with manual tracking of expenses and setting budgets, leading to disorganized finances and difficulty in gaining insights for better financial management.

Users need to manually create structured project plans, which is time-consuming and often lacks adaptability to different goals or industries

Product managers manually develop positioning strategies and analyze improvement factors, which is time-consuming and lacks efficiency.

Users manage tasks with traditional project management tools that are bloated and cause distractions, leading to inefficiency and complexity in workflows.