PH Deck

Founders often struggle with developing their MVP (Minimum Viable Product), gaining initial users, and demonstrating product velocity due to lack of guidance, resources, and initial investment.

Users struggle to achieve their goals efficiently and effectively within a standard annual timeframe.

Entrepreneurs and startups wanting to build MVPs face time-consuming and expensive development processes with traditional agencies or freelancers, delaying market validation and increasing costs.

Users struggle with traditional annual planning methods that lead to procrastination, lack of focus, and low goal achievement rates due to the long timeframe and insufficient urgency.

Non-technical founders struggle to launch MVPs efficiently due to high costs, long timelines, and dependency on external tech teams for product development.

Currently, entrepreneurs trying to develop a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) often face lengthy development timelines and high costs. The typical process can be slow and expensive, creating barriers for fast-paced innovation. lengthy development timelines, high costs.

Users lack resources to learn value investing principles and struggle with analyzing investments for long-term benefits.

Users struggle to invest in and support innovative tech projects through traditional methods, facing barriers like high entry costs, limited access to niche opportunities, and lack of direct involvement in shaping tech advancements.

Individuals often struggle to track their weekly achievements, leading to a lack of goal fulfillment and motivation. Traditional methods such as written journals or sporadic check-ins with accountability partners can be inconsistent and easily neglected. These methods have drawbacks including difficulty to consistently maintain attention, potential loss of physical records, and unstructured goal tracking that hampers motivation and clarity.

Users with startup ideas struggle to transform their concepts into a viable product due to long development cycles and high costs.