PH Deck

Users manage tasks using basic to-do lists or generic apps, which lack prioritization by urgency/importance. Difficulty prioritizing tasks by urgency and importance, leading to inefficiency and inefficient task management without Eisenhower Matrix framework

Users often struggle to effectively prioritize their tasks and goals, falling into the trap of tackling unimportant tasks and not utilizing their time efficiently.

Users struggle with task prioritization and management, leading to procrastination and inefficiency. The primary drawbacks include difficulty in identifying high-value tasks and a lack of a systematic approach to task management.

Users struggle to prioritize tasks effectively in Google Tasks due to lack of urgency/importance categorization, leading to disorganization and stress

Users struggle with prioritizing tasks effectively, leading to inefficiencies and stress.

Visually organizing and managing their to-do list is a challenge.

Users face challenges in organizing tasks effectively within their browser interface

Users struggle with traditional task management systems that often do not efficiently leverage technology to optimize productivity and organization. The current situation often involves manually prioritizing and scheduling tasks across various platforms, which can be both time-consuming and prone to human error. Manually prioritizing and scheduling tasks is a key drawback.

Users manage tasks, track time, and analyze productivity using separate tools, leading to inefficient workflows and fragmented data.

Users struggle with task execution and completion using traditional task managers without built-in timers or Pomodoro functionality, leading to reduced focus and productivity.

Users need to switch back and forth between their browser and task management tools, leading to inefficiency and interruptions in their workflow.