PH Deck

Users lack engaging platforms to practice critical thinking and debating skills with dynamic, intelligent opponents, relying on static materials or generic chatbots that lack interactive challenge and personality-driven discourse.

Users lack engaging and interactive ways to participate in debates on current topics. Traditional debate formats may not be accessible or stimulating enough for some individuals.

Students and other debaters currently practice debate skills using traditional methods, like in-person group sessions, but these have several drawbacks, such as scheduling conflicts, limited feedback, and lack of personalized learning, which can hinder skill development. scheduling conflicts, limited feedback, lack of personalized learning

Game developers struggle to prototype 3D games efficiently using traditional engines like Unity or Unreal, facing time-consuming coding, asset creation, and workflow complexities that hinder rapid iteration.

Parents and their children often struggle to find engaging activities that promote creativity. The lack of engaging, creative activities that can simultaneously entertain and foster artistic growth in children is a significant drawback.

Users need to alt-tab or use second devices to access game guides, which disrupts gameplay immersion and delays real-time assistance during critical moments.

Users currently conduct manual investment research, which is time-consuming and challenging to synthesize diverse opinions.

Users struggle to improve their reasoning, communication, and critical thinking skills through traditional methods like self-study or inconsistent human debates, which lack real-time, accessible, and adaptive feedback.

Users often struggle to find platforms that facilitate meaningful debates on complex topics, lacking engaging, intellectual discussions that offer diverse perspectives.