PH Deck

Users struggle to improve their reasoning, communication, and critical thinking skills through traditional methods like self-study or inconsistent human debates, which lack real-time, accessible, and adaptive feedback.

Students and other debaters currently practice debate skills using traditional methods, like in-person group sessions, but these have several drawbacks, such as scheduling conflicts, limited feedback, and lack of personalized learning, which can hinder skill development. scheduling conflicts, limited feedback, lack of personalized learning

Users previously needed to manually create learning plans or use non-AI platforms, facing time-consuming setup and lack of personalization, leading to inefficient progress tracking and engagement.

Users need to gather news from multiple platforms and manually filter content, which is time-consuming manual filtering and limited language options for global audiences.

Users aiming to launch an AI tools marketplace face high development costs, technical complexity, and long timelines when building from scratch.

Industries manage energy, water, and emissions with manual processes or fragmented tools, leading to high operational costs, inefficient resource allocation, and slow progress toward net-zero goals.

Users rely on manual stock research and basic tools, leading to slower decisions and missed opportunities due to inability to process complex market data efficiently

Users face difficulties practicing structured debates and obtaining objective feedback due to limited access to human opponents/judges and inconsistent scoring.

Users previously managed clinical trials with manual processes and fragmented tools, leading to inefficiencies in patient recruitment, data collection, and compliance adherence.

Users lack engaging and interactive ways to participate in debates on current topics. Traditional debate formats may not be accessible or stimulating enough for some individuals.