PH Deck

Users need random selection tools for decisions, games, or events but use manual methods or basic tools which are time-consuming and lack customization options.

Users often manually pick names or options using methods like drawing from a hat or basic digital tools, which are time-consuming and lack customization or interactivity.

Users rely on manual methods or basic online tools for random selections, which can be time-consuming and lack customization options for specific use cases like raffles, team games, or interactive giveaways.

Users rely on manual methods like drawing names or basic digital tools for random selection, which are time-consuming and lack engagement.

Users need a tool for random decisions or giveaways but rely on manual methods or basic digital tools. Lack customization, weighted options, and winner tracking.

Users manually select names from a list for tasks like giveaways, team assignments, or decisions, which is time-consuming and prone to bias or inconsistency.

Users manually draw names or use basic tools like physical wheels or simple randomizers, leading to inefficiency, lack of engagement, and difficulty in managing fair selections for giveaways, raffles, or classroom activities.

Users struggle with making random decisions or organizing giveaways and promotional games manually, leading to inefficiency, biases, and lack of engagement.

Users previously relied on manual methods like drawing names from a hat or physical spin wheels for random selections, which are time-consuming to set up, lack customization options, and cannot be easily shared or reused.

Users previously relied on separate physical tools or basic digital methods (like flipping a real coin, drawing straws) or fragmented apps for random decision-making, facing time-consuming manual processes and lack of customization and flexibility.