PH Deck

Users need to improve typing skills but lack effective tools for real-time feedback and progress tracking. Tracking progress effectively and getting immediate feedback

Users practice typing using traditional software or online tests that lack engagement and real-time competition, leading to inconsistent motivation and slower skill improvement.

Users need to manually check typing speed & accuracy which is time-consuming and inefficient, leading to slow improvement.

Users need to improve typing speed but face registration requirements and limited access to free lessons with traditional platforms.

Users struggle with slow typing speeds and inaccuracies using traditional methods like manual practice or outdated software, leading to reduced productivity and inefficient preparation for typing tests.

Users rely on existing typing practice tools like TypeRacer, MonkeyType, and TypingClub, but face low engagement, limited features, and lack of fun in their practice sessions.

Users practice typing speed/accuracy alone using traditional methods (e.g., static tests), leading to lack of engagement and motivation to practice consistently and no interactive or competitive elements.

Users need to manually check their NAT type using complex network settings or command-line tools, causing confusion and technical barriers for non-experienced individuals.

Users rely on traditional typing tests to measure their typing speed and accuracy, which often lack features for continuous improvement and engagement. The drawbacks include the inability to track progress over time, limited variety in test difficulty and formats, and lack of incentives such as certification. Lack of engaging features and progress tracking and lack of incentives such as certification.

Users need to take typing speed tests that often require signing up, offer limited language options, and lack detailed performance analytics or real-time feedback, reducing accessibility and improvement efficiency.