PH Deck

Programmers often need to practice coding to maintain and enhance their skills. The current situation involves using generic typing tests or traditional editors for practice, which do not focus on coding-specific nuances.

The problem with the old solution is that it does not cater to coding-specific practices, lacks engagement, and does not simulate real-world coding scenarios.

Users rely on traditional typing tests to measure their typing speed and accuracy, which often lack features for continuous improvement and engagement. The drawbacks include the inability to track progress over time, limited variety in test difficulty and formats, and lack of incentives such as certification. Lack of engaging features and progress tracking and lack of incentives such as certification.

Users may struggle to understand their nuanced personality traits and how they impact their problem-solving and collaboration skills.

Drawbacks: Limited insights into specific INTP, ENTP, INFP, and ENFP personality types can lead to superficial self-awareness.

Users need to manually check typing speed & accuracy which is time-consuming and inefficient, leading to slow improvement.

Users struggle with manual content creation and testing processes, leading to inefficiencies, higher costs, and slower time-to-market for digital products.

Users rely on fragmented communication tools without encryption, leading to unencrypted chats and fragmented workflows across multiple apps.

Users need to improve typing speed but face registration requirements and limited access to free lessons with traditional platforms.

Users need to improve typing skills but lack effective tools for real-time feedback and progress tracking. Tracking progress effectively and getting immediate feedback

Users manually manage test cases, execute tests, and track bugs in Jira, leading to inefficient workflows, fragmented processes, and human errors in QA testing.