PH Deck

Users previously relied on personality tests that required payment or sign-up, which limited accessibility and delayed results.

Users may struggle to understand their nuanced personality traits and how they impact their problem-solving and collaboration skills.

Drawbacks: Limited insights into specific INTP, ENTP, INFP, and ENFP personality types can lead to superficial self-awareness.

Users rely on generic workouts that don't account for their unique body composition, leading to ineffective fitness results and lack of personalization.

Users need to manually check their NAT type using complex network settings or command-line tools, causing confusion and technical barriers for non-experienced individuals.

Users rely on traditional typing tests to measure their typing speed and accuracy, which often lack features for continuous improvement and engagement. The drawbacks include the inability to track progress over time, limited variety in test difficulty and formats, and lack of incentives such as certification. Lack of engaging features and progress tracking and lack of incentives such as certification.

Users often struggle to initiate or progress in creative projects due to a lack of inspiration and innovative ideas, leading to stagnation and frustration in their creative endeavours. The lack of inspiration and innovative ideas is the key drawback.

Users practice typing using random, disconnected words leading to boredom and lack of real-world application.

Users currently rely on generic personality tests (e.g., standard MBTI) not specifically addressing love dynamics and compatibility in relationships, leading to vague or irrelevant romantic insights.

Users previously relied on paid or less comprehensive personality tests to understand their MBTI type, facing issues with accessibility and depth of analysis.

Users previously relied on time-consuming manual conversions or multiple specialized tools requiring signups, facing manual calculations and signup barriers for basic unit conversions.