PH Deck

Users need to assess their English proficiency levels but face cost barriers and sign-up requirements with traditional platforms or courses, limiting accessibility and convenience.

Users looking to improve their spoken German find it difficult to accurately assess their proficiency level and receive personalized feedback or recommendations for improvement.

Users seeking an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis face difficulty accessing professional online assessment tools

Limited availability and accessibility of multiple professional tests for autism spectrum disorder diagnosis online

Users studying for Cambridge English exams face challenges with unlimited, AI-powered Use of English and Reading exercises for levels B1, B2, C1, and C2.

Users facing potential emotional health issues related to Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) often lack access to quick and accurate screening resources. Traditional methods, such as in-person clinical assessments, can be costly, time-consuming, and nerve-wracking. These methods might not provide immediate feedback, leading to delays in understanding one's mental health situation. Access to quick and accurate screening resources

Users need to manually check device functionality through multiple settings or separate tools, which is time-consuming and inconvenient. Existing solutions often require logins, tracking, or software installations, raising privacy and usability concerns.

Users may struggle to identify symptoms and understand Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) on their own, leading to potential misdiagnosis or lack of awareness

Users need a challenging and engaging online puzzle game to play on both PC and mobile devices without the need for downloads.

Marketers and researchers often struggle with determining the statistical significance of their A/B testing results. The complexity of calculating and understanding what changes in user volumes, conversion rates, and confidence levels imply for their tests are significant drawbacks of the old situation.

Users rely on traditional typing tests to measure their typing speed and accuracy, which often lack features for continuous improvement and engagement. The drawbacks include the inability to track progress over time, limited variety in test difficulty and formats, and lack of incentives such as certification. Lack of engaging features and progress tracking and lack of incentives such as certification.