PH Deck

Readers of classic literature struggle to engage with and deeply understand complex texts due to lack of interactive guidance, contextual explanations, and critical analysis tools during reading.

Users experience lower reading speed and difficulty maintaining focus and comprehension with traditional reading methods

Users struggle to keep track of what they have read online

Drawbacks: It can be challenging for users to remember which pages they have visited, leading to confusion and inefficiency in managing online content.

WordPress users are forced to adapt to the new Gutenberg block editor, which hides the Classic Editor interface, TinyMCE (WYSIWYG), Meta Boxes (Custom Fields), and other legacy features, causing discomfort and inefficiency for those accustomed to the old workflow.

Users may struggle to assess and reflect on their reading habits accurately, leading to a lack of awareness of their preferences, trends, and potential biases.

Users seeking to improve their reading skills rely on traditional methods like physical tutoring or self-study. The drawbacks of these methods are high costs and limited accessibility.

Users struggle to share creative content on traditional social platforms due to algorithmic bias, follower-centric visibility, and fear of content theft.

Currently, users seeking new books to read face challenges in finding curated selections that cater to both classic and modern tastes. The drawbacks of this old situation include difficulty in efficiently discovering novels that match personal interests and a lack of easily accessible and diverse literary content.

Users previously relied on physical prayer books or apps requiring internet access to daily readings without internet, facing unattractive or outdated designs.

Users previously relied on manual methods or basic apps to keep track of their reading progress and manage their reading materials efficiently, which often resulted in disorganized tracking, lack of real-time insights, and time-consuming management.